Tuesday, 3 May 2016

Ravenstonedale - Where??


  RAVENSTONEDALE STATION served the village of Newbiggin on Lune, and indeed was so named until 1877, renamed presumably to avoid confusion with Newbiggin by the Sea in Northumberland. Ravenstonedale itself is a valley some two miles toward Kirkby Stephen, so query whether the overall level of understanding was improved!

  The station marked the end of the relatively easy 7 miles (by Stainmore standards - a ruling gradient of 111!) through the Lune Valley to its source, and the steepening of the climb for the last mile to Sandy Bank Summit at 889ft, just shy of Shap. It was also the end of the double track section from 1931 - the drop in minerals traffic meant this part of the line could be worked as one long section to Kirkby Stephen West, and the box at Sandy Bank which was formerly the end of the double track was taken out of use and cut back by a mile.
  Unusual for the route, the station has staggered platforms but otherwise is of similar architecture to others. The station was well known for its beautiful garden. Thankfully it survives as a private dwelling, though balancing perilously above the A685 which now occupies the trackbed to Tebay.

  Passenger traffic was light - the typical working was a solitary coach hauled by a J21 or an Ivatt / Standard Class 2 from Tebay to connect with the Darlington - Penrith service at Kirkby Stephen. 

  The station closed to passenger traffic in 1952 (as with neighboring Gaisgill to the west) but the line remained open not just for minerals traffic, but for through summer workings to Blackpool from the North East, which at 8 coaches were double headed throughout.


  The other regular passenger working was an unadvertised working from the North East to Ulverston, serving the Miner's convalescent home and was usually fortnightly. This often saw a mixture of rolling stock from the bottom drawer, and on occasions an LNER Sentinel Steam Railcar which must have been a fireman's nightmare on such gradients!


  Not to be outdone by the Great Central, Phil has kindly produced a set of 16T steel mineral wagons for the route, which can be seen in the goods yard and on the coal drops.


 More Soon. . . . . . . . . . .

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

'Scene' It, Done It. . . . . . . . .

  DUE TO THE demands of everyday life, progress reports have been few and far between of late. However, recently Ben sent through some progress images and a brief report, which I'll present below:

  "There's been quite a bit of progress on Stainmore. It's all scenery really, but I've done most of the field boundaries between KS and Appleby and a fair bit of terrain painting and farms, trees and telegraph poles. Starting to feel like a route!"



 "It's at the tediously boring stage of scenery, but the lineside fencing and telegraphs are pretty much done. If you look at the Kirkby Stephen East to Appleby section, you'll see some progress."

  So, now, following Ben's advice, we'll take a look at said section:

Looking at Kirkby Stephen East the scene around the station is slowly coming together
Looking west at KSE. The Stainmore Line goes off to the left, with the Eden Valley line heading off to the right.
A farm alongside the railway at KSE. The near line is the Eden Valley line, which we'll follow to Appleby
The beauty of the Eden Valley route is being delightfully recreated here by Ben
Soon after leaving KSE, the Eden Valley line reaches it's first river crossing
Musgrave Viaduct
Looking west off Musgrave platform end
One of the many beautifully detailed cuttings on the Eden Valley
That concludes our brief look at some progress on the route. It's slowly getting there! Many sections of the route are now looking largely complete. 

Another major task to carry out is signalling the whole route. We're looking for assistance with this. If you are interested in helping with signalling, please Contact Us. That would involve making custom signals for the routes.

More Soon. . . . . . . . . . .

Friday, 22 January 2016

Don’t Fence Me In - By Ben Yates

THERE IS a wonder in having a simulator in which you can import (reasonably) accurate terrain data and satellite imagery that allows you to create the past, and get some sense of what it must have been like to travel on a long closed line in the past. Stainmore as a railway was documented in wonderful detail by the late Peter Walton in his book, and along with other authors and the archive of the NER Association we have little excuse for getting the details wrong.

Naturally, you’d thing that was the hard part of route building – but you’d be wrong. The greatest compliment to a route is that it “feels right” or “has the right atmosphere” – code I think for not looking like every other route out there, and having little details that you notice and that’s what we’ve been trying to achieve here. Grand custom buildings are all well and good, but they are unlikely to feature more than a few times in a route. Phil has gone for signal boxes and stations as the main eye candy, but to me what makes this look like a railway is how it relates to the landscape. This has always been at best a compromise ever since Kuju Rail Sim given the crude 6 m terrain mesh, but with some thought and scenic assets, cuttings and bridges can be accurately put in place.
An example of an accommodation bridge, this one being at Stainmore Summit
Stainmore’s engineer, Thomas Bouch, was known for his “economical” approach to railway navigation (read “slow and twisty”) and like his later work CKPR, Stainmore seems to have more bridges per mile than any other railway I have found. The majority of these are “accommodation” bridges – allowing access over or under the line between land that the railway severs.  We’ve used the NER Engineer’s line diagrams, old OS maps, satellite images and good old boot leather to get them all, and whilst driving you probably have at least 1 in sight at any one time.
Looking towards Bowes, fencing lining the railway boundary can be seen on the cutting sides
The other issue there is that the railway was required to be fenced off – I’d expect this was to ensure livestock didn’t stray onto the line, though some landowners may have viewed this as preventing rail staff from accessing their land!  The Rail Regulation Act 1842 section required that “All railway companies shall be under the same liability of obligation to erect, and to maintain and repair, good and sufficient fences throughout the whole of their respective lines… ” which survives in a close form to this day in the Railway Safety (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 1997.

Extensive stone walling in the Bowes area
That’s a lot of fencing, but we now have all the lineside fencing in place, including linking in to all the accommodation bridges. A similar task is the miles and miles of dry stone walls and field boundaries either side of the line. I wanted this route to be one you could see the trains in the landscape from a distance, and not just one that looked right from the cab. Having terrain rising from the railway means this can be visible for quite a distance.
Walled boundaries and painted terrain really set the right tone for this scene with Belah in the background
If the next route is on a coast, you’ll understand why!
The scene at Belah is complete thanks to those finer details having been put in place

Sunday, 15 November 2015

STAINMORE MINERAL WAGONS - By Phil Baines



 
© ForgottenRelics
  IN ORDER to understand the rolling stock used by the Stainmore railway it helps to know a little of the origins of the route.
  The Industrial revolution was powered by steam, fuelled  by coal and built of iron.  The need to supply these heavy minerals to the burgeoning industrial areas could not be met by the roads and transport available at the time, hence the investment in railways, ideal for bulky heavy traffic, to fulfil the need.
  Initial growth in iron production was adjacent to the ore supplies and saw the development of large iron making complexes in both the North East of England and West Cumberland. The need to transfer minerals across country to feed these industrial complexes was instrumental in the demand for a Trans-Pennine railway, but was further enhanced by a quirk of geology.
  The iron ores quarried/mined in West Cumberland were much lower in phosphorus content than those of Durham/North Yorkshire, which has a significant impact on the quality of steel that is produced.
  In 1856 the production of steel was vastly enhanced by the development of the Bessemer Furnace, the first of which was installed in Workington and this, combined with the quality of the iron ore, meant the Cumberland Ironmasters had a huge demand for coal and coke to fuel their furnaces.
  Consequently, it was a win win situation with coal and coke shipping East to West and quality iron ore West to East, a route over the Pennines was inevitable. Construction started in 1857 and the line opened for mineral traffic in 1861.
  The NER was the principle operating company associated with the mineral traffic over Stainmore and were to develop a number of suitable  wagons over the years, but the final format was the P7, which were produced in huge quantities (by the time of the 1923 grouping there were over 17,000 of the NER wagons in use).
   Construction started in 1903 and, as was often the case, the design evolved over time. The above picture is typical of the early construction with brake levers at both ends but brake pads only to one side. Note the extended end posts which acted as dumb buffers when the wagons were shunted with Chaldron wagons.
  The NER undertook a number of experiments with these vehicles to attempt to reduce rolling resistance including the provision of a second outside set of W irons  to add stiffening to the axles.  A further variant, saw an anti-friction bearing added.  This was a wheel that ran on the top of the axle and the idea was that as it rotated less, there would be less friction.  The introduction of an open bearing surface that would instantly get contaminated with coal and dust would actually have the exact opposite impact  and these were no longer seen by the grouping era.
  Following grouping many of these wagons passed into LNER hands,  who quickly decided to chop off the extensions and this version is the first mineral wagon created for the route.
  The other major variation to the P7 was the provision of brake handles to the side, rather than the end and this is the second variant modelled for the route.


  The LNER were obviously happy with this design as they went on to produce over 7000 wagons to an almost identical pattern, the principle difference being the use of T-section iron end posts in place  of the wooden ones seen in the NER versions. These wagons were to continue in service for a long time, some were still in use in the 1960's, many finding work as internal user wagons in NCB coal yards long after retirement from main line use.
  This was the third variant modelled for the route, shown here in Workington Iron & Steel Co. livery. Note that, as can be glimpsed in this picture, all these wagon models can be selected as either unloaded or with a coal load.
  It is of interest to note that the NER discouraged the use of Private Owner wagons, preferring to lease out its own high capacity hopper wagons at competitive rates, in the interests of standardisation,  rather than allowing PO versions, However, any that can be identified may be included with the route.
  The final variant is a low poly version of the LNER wagon for populating sidings.
  The Railway Clearing House (RCH) was an organisation supported by all Britain's railway companies. Its main function was to apportion income for journeys that crossed company boundaries, but it also had the role of developing standard patterns for wagons, which could be built by any railway company or private owner in the knowledge that they would be accepted anywhere.
  In 1907 the Railway Clearing House (RCH) prepared a set of regulations for the construction of 8,10 & 12 ton wagons, however after about 1910 the 12 ton wagons became more popular and by 1923 a new RCH specification was released, a rugged and simple design employing standard RCH fittings throughout, which included oil axleboxes, brake shoe that could be fitted universally and coil sprung buffers. Originally they had to be built with seven side planks, making an overall body height of 4' 4", although an 8 plank variant was later permitted, plus various configurations of side doors, end door and bottom doors, however, the weight of the unladen wagon was not to be above 7 tons 5 cwt. It became the most numerous design of coal wagon built in the UK.
  The 1923 RCH standard was used not only for private owner  wagon construction, but also readily adopted by the L.M.S. and L.N.E.R. In fact the L.M.S. constructed more that 30,000 wagons to the standard 7-plank design many wagons lasting well into the 1960’s.
  Whilst typically used to transport coal for domestic and boiler use rather than steelworks, they undoubtedly played a significant part in the Stainmore mineral traffic.
  An LNER version has been modelled for the route, other liveries may be included, along with low poly versions.
  Because coal has a density, when in lumps, of  about 1100kg/cu metre, compared to 550-65kg/cu metre for coke, the carrying ability of these wagons was under resourced when used for coke, therefore, there was a need to enhance the volumetric capacity. This was achieved by raising the overall height of the wagon with additional planks known as "raves". An example of this is included with the route.
  In view of the extensive use of hopper wagons for the conveyance of coal, in 1936 the LNER released diag 100, a design for an all steel riveted construction 20 ton hopper wagon. They would later be upgraded to 21 ton capacity.
This was to be nearly as successful as its NER predecessor with over 13,000 built prior to Nationalisation. Following nationalisation the 21ton steel-bodied coal hopper was the standard BR coal hopper until the advent of air-braked types in the 1960s and 1970s. The first three lots built for BR comprised a total of 1200 wagons to diagram 1/141, built in 1949 the design was identical to the LNER-built wagons and even featured the distinctive straight brake levers. Over 23,000 wagons were built, making them one of the most numerous types on BR. The LNER version has been modeled for the route.
  In many pictures these wagons have plates riveted to the side of the hopper body, but, as they aren't shown in Peter Taplow's famous book, nor did they appear consistent with the construction of the wagon, they were omitted from the model. Examples of the plates can be seen in this welded version hopper at the NYMR.
  I have since established that these are "Rap" plates. They were strong points on the hopper so it could be hit (rapped) with a sledge hammer to dislodge wet or frozen coal that had become stuck in the wagon! Never too old to learn. . . . . . . . . . . . . .