The
signalling also changed over time – particularly the rather cynical
approach by British Railways in the late 1950s to carry out unnecessary
expenditure on infrastructure to provide a justification for closure.
Certainly the photographs demonstrate a change from NER lower quadrant
signals to BR upper quadrant signals prior to closure in 1962 – yet on
the West Coast line, many LNWR lower quadrants survived until
electrification.
The
North Eastern Railway had (it becomes apparent from photos) various
designs – decorative lattice signals, slotted post signals, and simpler
wooden square posts. They also didn’t take a simple approach to
signalling, the adage being why use one signal when you can use three.
There was also an early operational practice for passenger services to
run through stations and reverse into a bay platform – the layout at
Barnard Castle certainly lends itself to that, and does nothing to
simplify the signalling.
The
default TS16 signals, aside from being inadequate to signal parts of the
route, certainly don't look anything like the signalling on the route.
We are pleased to announce that Anthony Brailsford has agreed that we
can use his excellent LNWR signals for the route. These are perfect for
the Grayrigg to Penrith sections, and definitely look the part on the
Stainmore and EVR sections.
On the
West Coast mainline, the LNWR favoured tall co-acting home signals
visible from long distances – certainly handy descending Shap at high
speed or with a heavy train. The most well-known example was the up
signal at Scout Green, which I estimate to be around 55 feet tall –
other examples featured at Penrith and Tebay. There was a
rationalisation of signalling by the LMS, with a number of boxes taken
out and replaced with intermediate block signals – colour lights
controlled by neighbouring boxes.
One of the aforementioned tall signals, this one at the south end of Tebay station |
Another of the very tall signals at Scout Green |
The
Eden Valley line was single track, with token working split into
sections. Intermediate stations at Temple Sowerby and Musgrave had
cabins on the platform operating signals, though it is unclear what
function these had without swapping tokens and I would surmise from the
timetable, they were permanently switched out. Signals protected
crossings at Cliburn, Waitby and (I think) Kelleth, worked from a ground
frame.
Later
in the line’s history, the Stainmore section west of the Summit was
divided into sections, providing virtual single line working over
viaducts at Merrygill, Belah, Aitygill and Mousegill, though both
running lines remained in situ, and token exchange platforms were
provided. Only 1 train was permitted on Belah at a time, and this
approach was also taken on Aitygill for structural reasons. The others
are not documented, but the Merrygill signal diagram on closure
certainly reflect this operation. Following are a selection of images showing the new signals in place in and around Kirkby Stephen East station.
East of the station. The bracket is controlling entry to the Stainmore and EVR platforms, as well as sidings |
Looking west, from the station. All these signals control passage to Tebay and Penrith. |
Signal box can be seen in the background which controls all the signals at the west-end of the station and it's approaches. |
Looking back east, an impressive gantry carries the signals for arrivals from the west. |
On the left is the outer home on the approach to KSE, from Penrith. The bracket signal on the right controls approaches from Tebay. |
A departure signal for trains heading to the summit |
As
previously blogged, the Tebay line was rationalised in 1924 following
the downturn of mineral traffic leaving a long single line block from
Kirkby Stephen to Ravenstonedale. Still no answer whether the Smardale
Box moved to Merrygill in 1924!
Signalling on the route is pretty much complete aside from the colour light sections on the WCML to do.
Shaping up to be a classic!
ReplyDelete